First drive: Mini Clubvan


Mini has dipped its toes into the LCV market reviving a concept first seen more than 50 years ago. The Mini Clubvan might seem a logical step given that the original Morris Mini van of 1960, but for the current Mini brand as part of BMW Group, commercial vehicles are an alien concept.

It’s probably true that Mini doesn’t aspire to big fleet deals with the Mini Clubvan, instead appealing more to small businesses. But in the niche world of car-derived vans, Mini has created a vehicle that would seem to do the job well, at least on paper.

Prices start at £11,175 (excluding VAT), there is a payload of 500kg (there or thereabouts with a Ford Fiesta van and 50kg lower than a Vauxhall Corsavan), and a load volume of 0.86 cu m – close to the Corsavan’s 0.9 cu m, although further behind the Fiesta van’s 1.0 cu m.
So it isn’t class-leading, but is still competitive while the estate body style inherited from the Mini

Clubman could help improve practicality over its hatchback rivals. The Clubvan load width is never less than 1,020mm, which is better than the Corsavan and Fiesta van measurement between the wheel arches.

Mini is expecting the Clubvan to appeal to “lifestyle focused” businesses, and for whom, perhaps, the distinctive Mini could be an extra marketing tool.

Mini is offering a choice of two petrol engines and one diesel: the 98bhp One; the 122bhp Cooper and the 112bhp Cooper D, the latter achieving 72.4mpg on the combined cycle. It might not be the most economical car-derived van (Vauxhall offer an 83.1mpg version of the Corsavan while Ford has an Econetic version of the Fiesta Van which achieves 76.3mpg), but the Clubvan’s performance and driver appeal are almost ample compensation. Let’s face it, this type of van is more likely to be aligned to an urban cycle fuel consumption figure, which in the case of the Mini is 64.2mpg. Depreciation also reflects that of Mini’s car range, as is slow.

All versions come with six-speed manual gearboxes as standard, although both Cooper and Cooper D variants can be chosen with an optional six-speed automatic.

Our test vehicle was fitted with optional 17-inch alloys (part of the wide range of options available, as well as heated leather seats on ours), which made me worry for any fragile cargo that might be transported over poor urban road surfaces, although the standard 15-inch alloy wheels would offer a less fraught behaviour.

Otherwise the Clubvan is a delight to drive. It is as nippy and manoeuvrable as any car in the Mini range, the engine is refined, and the quality of materials in the cab surpasses any other small van.

There might not be any big fleet deals in the offing, but a number of businesses will certainly see the attraction of this surprisingly likable small van.

CO2 emissions and fuel consumption data correct at time of writing. The latest figures are available in the Fleet News fuel cost calculator and the company car tax calculator.

Leave a comment for your chance to win £20 of John Lewis vouchers.

Every issue of Fleet News the editor picks his favourite comment from the past two weeks – get involved for your chance to appear in print and win!

Comment as guest

Login / Register


  • james freestone - 26/02/2013 22:47

    I've driven a dealer demo on standard 15'' wheels, and the ride is transformed compared with a mini hatch or clubman on 17'' or even 16'' wheels. A shame as looks wise the standard 15''ers don't fill the wheelarches, but to drive and live with everyday the standard wheels are by far the best bet, hugely more comfortable to drive and still very little bodyroll. The dealer also claimed no difference in mpg if wheels are upsized, but having tested a mini one hatch on 15'' and then on 17'', I saw an average drop of 3mpg on the 17'', which I believe is down to the extra tyre width on the 17's.

    Reply as guest

    Login / Register